YProductions






Gluttony Posted by Steve Dietz on December 30, 2004 12:05 PM

Happy holidays

Gluttony

James le Palmer, Glutton Being Sick
James le Palmer, Omne Bonum (1360-1375), (Detail) Historiated initial 'G' containing a scene representing gluttony, with man vomiting into a cup, flanked by two companions. British Library.
(From Lat. gluttire, to swallow, to gulp down), the excessive indulgence in food and drink. The moral deformity discernible in this vice lies in its defiance of the order postulated by reason, which prescribes necessity as the measure of indulgence in eating and drinking. This deordination, according to the teaching of the Angelic Doctor [St. Thomas Aquinas], may happen in five ways which are set forth in the scholastic verse: "Prae-propere, laute, nimis, ardenter, studiose" or, according to the apt rendering of Father Joseph Rickably: too soon, too expensively, too much, too eagerly, too daintily.
The Catholic Encyclopedia
Most dictionaries define "gluttony" primarily as excess in eating or drinking, but it is its moral dimension as one of the Seven Deadly Sins that propels it into the popular imagination as something more than over indulging. As Aquinas (1225-1274) wrote in his Summa Theologica:
Gluttony denotes, not any desire of eating and drinking, but an inordinate desire. Now desire is said to be inordinate through leaving the order of reason, wherein the good of moral virtue consists: and a thing is said to be a sin through being contrary to virtue. Wherefore it is evident that gluttony is a sin.
Continue reading "Gluttony"...


#1411 Mapping Dissent Posted by Steve Dietz on December 23, 2004 2:59 PM


ToDo #1411 Map dissent and difference

Brian Holmes is one of the most lucid critics and theorists writing today and for the past 4 years, "as a direct result of involvement in demonstrations against the policies of the WTO and IMF," much of his work has been on mapping.

In a recent post to the locative-media list, he wrote about what is missing from many maps. Bureau d'Etudes, "INFOWAR PSYCHICWAR"
When Josh On [www.theyrule.net] or Bureau d'Etudes [http://utangente.free.fr/index2.html] make their complex charts of contemporary power relations, one can be assured that the cold and abstract character of the results is very painful to them. I can testify, particularly in the second case, that they are acutely aware of what is missing from such documents: namely, some affective indication of resistance from below, who does it, how they work and why.
He continues:
I often wonder why contemporary artists appear so broadly unable to infuse the dominant map with representations of - or even better, direct links to - the many and diverse dissenting groups and alternative philosophies that are now emerging in the world, or that have remained active over decades.
On your favorite map of power that matters to you, identify the nodes of/for dissent and alternative points of view.
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:14:16 +0100
To: locative@x-i.net
From: Brian Holmes 
Subject: [Locative] A Reply to Coco Fusco
http://locative.x-i.net/


Is it all Robert Morris's fault? Posted by Steve Dietz on December 19, 2004 7:32 PM

Is it all Robert Morris's fault?

One of the persistent questions around new media art and its institutional neglect is why? There is plenty of other contemporary art that is ephemeral, variable, and hard to collect, among other epithets. A recent installation at Tate Modern may shed some light on this.

"Visitors Play Role in Funfair Art"

The Daily Telegraph, 28 April 1971

"Assault Course at Tate Gallery"

Evening Standard, 30 April 1971

"The have-a-go show"

The Observer, May 1971

I am joking, of course, that the 1971 exhibition of artist Robert Morris's Neo Classic installation was the causal reason for new media art's current predicament. Nevertheless, the exhibition was terminated after only 5 days amidst headlines like the above, and Tate Modern's archival installation about the event, accompanying the display of the Morris-produced Neo Classic film "about" it, provides fascinating and perhaps even prescient parallels that are worth reading about in some detail.

Continue reading "Is it all Robert Morris's fault?"...


#1423 The Monstrosity of Seeing Posted by Steve Dietz on December 11, 2004 3:04 PM


ToDo #1423: See the Monster(s)

In a talk posted on TomPaine.common sense, journalist Bill Moyers first raises the specter of President Reagan's Secretary of the Interior, James Watts, who
told the U.S. Congress that protecting natural resources was unimportant in light of the imminent return of Jesus Christ. In public testimony he said, "after the last tree is felled, Christ will come back."
Snicker, snicker, right? Who are these freaks?

But Moyers goes on to point out:
The press corps didn't know what he was talking about. But James Watt was serious. So were his compatriots out across the country. They are the people who believe the Bible is literally true - one-third of the American electorate, if a recent Gallup poll is accurate. In this past election, several million good and decent citizens went to the polls believing in the rapture index. That's right葉he rapture index. Google it and you will find that the best-selling books in America today are the12 volumes of the "Left Behind" series written by the Christian fundamentalist and religious right warrior, Timothy LaHaye. These true believers subscribe to a fantastical theology concocted in the 19th century by a couple of immigrant preachers who took disparate passages from the Bible and wove them into a narrative that has captivated the imagination of millions of Americans.
Moyers ends with a rather standard but ambiguous, almost ambivalent, call to arms
The news is not good these days. I can tell you, though, that as a journalist I know the news is never the end of the story. The news can be the truth that sets us free溶ot only to feel but to fight for the future we want. And the will to fight is the antidote to despair, the cure for cynicism, and the answer to those faces looking back at me from those photographs on my desk. What we need to match the science of human health is what the ancient Israelites called 'hocma' 葉he science of the heart.....the capacity to see....to feel....and then to act...as if the future depended on you. Believe me, it does.
What does this mean? We should become "compassionate liberals," who feel more? I would place the emphasis on the first part of this hocma, the capacity to see.

Toward the end of Frederico Fellini's classic 1960 film La Dolce Vita, a group of "salt of the earth" fisherman land a "monstrous" sea creature, which the degenerate-sophisticates from the city stumble upon, literally, after a night of debauchery. The camera zooms in on the creature's eye, which stares back unblinkingly, perhaps representing the "monstrosity" of Fellini's own reportage in the movie.

It is momentarily gratifying to think of Karl Rove as that unblinking sea monster, poring over precinct level statistics, "seeing" the American electorate and craftily manipulating it. It is more difficult to really see for ourselves beyond the apparent monstrosity of the one-third of the American electorate who believe the Bible is literally true - name your favorite "monstrosity" - or, god forbid, to understand ourselves as the monstrous, and to truly act upon such knowledge. But it is a necessary precursor to action.


Bill Moyers, "The Delustional Is No Longer Marginal," December 10, 2004
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/the_delusional_is_no_longer_marginal.php